ethereum cryptocurrency will jettison speedier

ETHEREUM CRYPTOCURRENCY WILL JETTISON SPEEDIER PROFESSIONAL

I would never outright cite a Wikipedia article in a paper, but would use Wikipedia as a stepping stone to get to a reference that I can cite. For that reason I will only use its information if the fact I'm looking for has a verifiable reference that is widely accepted (eg a peer-reviewed paper). If 2), then I definitely care about plagiarism and whether it's correct. I do care if it's incorrect, but really even then if it's incorrect the impact on me is minor. If 1), then I don't really care if it's plagiarized. With something like Wikipedia I use it for two reasons: 1) as a source of information to appease for my own curiosity about various topics, or 2) as a source of information for real research that I'm doing. The last thing I ever wanted was to have my mistakes detract from their excellent work, and I'm doing everything I can to make it right.Īnd on Twitter, BuzzFeed's reporter added that 'I don't like that this story is being weaponized by bad actors like Steve Bannon to unfairly and baselessly smear the work of Snopes' staff writers who do good work and had no part in this.' Thanks to their efforts, Snopes has published original reporting on the COVID-19 pandemic, the recent elections, Russian disinformation efforts and so much more.

ETHEREUM CRYPTOCURRENCY WILL JETTISON SPEEDIER PROFESSIONAL

Snopes has grown beyond our roots as a 'one-man band' website into a newsroom of dedicated, professional journalists who serve the public with trustworthy information. Was it a victim of its own success - drawn into the 24/7 news cycle, with its 'race to be first'? Were they overwhelmed by the amount of misinformation being spread on social media that needed debunking? In a statement to BuzzFeed, Mikkelson had this to say: I remember when was just an entertaining fringe web site debunking kooky claims turning up in forwarded emails or on Usenet. A number of times I crossed the line to where it was copyright infringement. 'I wasn't used to doing news aggregation. In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Mikkelson attributed the unattributed sentence-copying to his lack of formal journalism experience.

Our reputation is dependent on our ability to get things right, and more importantly, to quickly correct the record when we are wrong.') Besides removing Mikkelson's purloined content (and preventing him, though he's still the site's co-owner, from publishing on it), says that in addition, 'We will attempt to contact each news outlet whose reporting we appropriated to issue an apology.' actually thanked BuzzFeed's reporter for letting them know, calling BuzzFeed's article ' an example of dogged, watchdog journalism we cherish' (while adding 'Our staff has moved quickly to fix the problem. BuzzFeed notes that Mikkelson himself had also begun using a pseudonym 'intended to mislead the trolls and conspiracy theorists who frequently targeted the site and its writers.' That byline linked to a satirical bio claiming that in 2006 they'd 'won the Pulitzer Prize for numismatics' (coin collecting) and were 'also the winner of the Distinguished Conflagration Award of the American Society of Muleskinners for 2005.'

Thanks to Slashdot reader PolygamousRanchKid for submitting this story. I hated it and wouldn't tell any of the staff to do it, but he did it all the time.' Two other former employees also said that copying and rewriting content was part of Mikkelson's strategy for driving traffic to Snopes' site. 'He would instruct us to copy text from other sites, post them verbatim so that it looked like we were fast and could scoop up traffic, and then change the story in real time. 'That was his big SEO/speed secret,' said Binkowski, whom Snopes fired without explanation in 2018 (she currently manages the fact-checking site Truth or Fiction). Snopes's subsequent internal review identified 140 articles with possible problems and 54 that were found to include appropriated material.

BuzzFeed News found dozens of articles on Snopes' site that include language - sometimes entire paragraphs - that appear to have been copied without attribution from news outlets that include the New York Times, CNN, NBC News, and the BBC. After inquiries from BuzzFeed News, Snopes conducted an internal review and confirmed that under a pseudonym, the Snopes byline, and his own name, Mikkelson wrote and published 54 articles with plagiarized material. describes them as ' sentences or paragraphs from various news sites pasted into Snopes news stories without appropriate attribution.'Ī BuzzFeed News investigation has found that between 20, Mikkelson wrote and published dozens of articles containing material plagiarized from news outlets such as the Guardian and the LA Times. The co-founder of the fact-checking website Snopes has been accused of publishing articles that are too accurate: copying text from other more authorative web sites.

Ethereum cryptocurrency will jettison speedier